Meta-Ontology of Descriptive Layers
(multi-logic and cross-logic validity in structured descriptions)
This research line studies how “structures” arise and remain valid inside a chosen descriptive layer. We treat a layer as a language/logic with its own admissible objects, relations, and rules of interpretation. The foundational claim is simple: validity is not a property of an absolute substrate, but a property of a description operating under explicit constraints.
Core question
Given a family of locally valid abstractions within a layer, under what conditions does their composition remain valid?
We distinguish between (i) constructions that preserve the layer’s invariants and continue to model the target mechanics,
and (ii) pseudo-structures that appear consistent but break validity when tested against interfaces, invariants, or translation constraints.
Methodological focus
We formalize: (a) admissibility conditions for objects and operators inside a layer; (b) minimal invariants that stabilize meaning
under composition; and (c) cross-layer translation criteria that preserve truth and prevent hidden “equivalence by wording.”
The emphasis is not on cataloguing concepts, but on defining checkable constraints for legitimate synthesis.
Relation to MAS
Within the MAS framework, this problem is treated as a closure-and-compatibility task: which operators, guards, and invariants
allow composition without violating architectural integrity, and which introduce silent degeneracies (self-locking, invariant substitution,
or loss of explanatory contact with the modeled domain).
Status
The project is in theoretical development. Implementation details, thresholds, and evaluation procedures are disclosed selectively
and only after methodological stabilization.